Previous   |    Close   |    Next

Table T54. Relative differences in log response between structurally different rock types described from Leg 206 and Expedition 309.

Lithology Depth
range
(mbsf)
Rock type Natural
gamma ray
(gAPI)
Resistivity (deep)
(Ωm)
Density
(g/cm3)
Neutron
porosity
(%)
Compressional
velocity
(km/s)
Lava pond 316–338 Massive basalt 2.0–3.8 40–100 2.9 5–7 5.5–5.8
Inflated flows 364–375 Pillow lava 5.3–6.0 5–10 2.3–2.6 23–36 4.2–4.6
Inflated flows 472–490 Massive basalt 1.9–3.0 50–110 2.8–2.9 4–11 5.4–5.7
Sheet and massive flows 580–632 Sheet flow 3.0–4.3 21–82 2.6–2.9 10–28 4.7–5.5
Sheet and massive flows 738–784 Sheet flow 3.0–9.0 1–4 2.6–2.8 13–23 4.5–5.1
Sheet and massive flows 819–835 Massive basalt 1.5–3.0 110–290 2.7–2.9 6–10 5.6–5.8
Sheet and massive flows 850–870 Sheet flow 2.0–9.5 11–21 2.4–2.8 13–27 4.6–5.1
Upper dikes 1120–1140 Massive basalt 1.5–2.0 310–800 2.8–2.9 6–10 5.8–6.2

Notes: Demonstrated in eight different sections of Hole 1256D. Well-logging data were averaged to 10 m running averages.

Previous   |    Close   |    Next   |    Top of page