IODP Proceedings    Volume contents     Search

doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.314315316.220.2012

Iodine geochronology in marine environments

Iodine concentrations in marine interstitial fluid from continental margins have been reported to rapidly increase with depth (Martin et al., 1993; Fehn et al., 1992; Tomaru et al., 2007b, 2009). This increase is ascribed to the strongest association of iodine with organic matter; sedimentation and subsequent degradation of iodine-rich organic matter at depth liberates iodine into the interstitial fluid, resulting in iodine concentrations considerably higher than typical seawater levels of 0.4 µM (Broecker and Peng, 1982; Burton, 1996; Muramatsu and Wedepohl, 1998).

The presence of the long-lived cosmogenic radioisotope 129I (T1/2 = 15.7 m.y.) has been used to date the time of separation of organic matter from the marine system (Fabryka-Martin et al., 1987; Fehn et al., 2000). The initial ratio for dating of iodine in the marine environment has been determined to be (1500 ± 150) × 10–15, which results in a dating range of ~80 m.y. for the 129I isotopic system (Fehn et al., 2007). The 129I/I ratio of interstitial fluid is sometimes modified by the input of fissiogenic 129I, which is produced by the spontaneous fission of 238U and released into interstitial fluid during migration through the sediment column. In the case here, however, fissiogenic input is negligible because of relatively low U concentration of 0.99 ppm in the subducting sediments in the Nankai Trough and high interstitial fluid iodine concentration (Fabryka-Martin et al., 1989; Plank and Langmuir, 1998; Tomaru et al., 2007a). Standard decay of 129I thus provides the elapsed time since the organic matter enriched in iodine has been isolated from seawater as (Fehn et al., 2007)

Robs = Rie–λ129t, (1)

where

  • Robs = observed 129I/I ratio,

  • Ri = initial seawater 129I/I ratio of 1500 × 10–15,

  • λ129 = decay constant of 129I (4.41 × 10–8 y–1), and

  • t = years since iodine deposition.

Although fissiogenic 129I or anthropogenic 129I are unlikely to have contributed to interstitial fluid in locations like those studied here (e.g., Fehn et al., 2000; Tomaru et al., 2007a), contribution from either source would have raised the ratio. The values calculated for the samples here are therefore minimum ages.