IODP Proceedings Volume contents Search | |||
Expedition reports Research results Supplementary material Drilling maps Expedition bibliography | |||
|
doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.342.206.2018 AppendixSystematic paleontology of selected taxaSuborder CYPRIDOCOPINA Jones, 1901 Superfamily PONTOCYPRIDOIDEA Müller, 1894 Family PONTOCYPRIDIDAE Müller, 1894 Genus ARGILLOECIA Sars, 1866; emend. Maddocks, 1991 Argilloecia sp. (Fig. F2A; Pl. P1, figs. 7, 8; Pl. P6, fig. 1) Description: Adult carapace robust and medium (591–598 µm long). In external view, lateral outline elongated subtrapezoidal: anterior margin round; posterior margin tapering; dorsal margin gentle arched; ventral margin curved, concave up in the anterior. Surface smooth. In internal view, anterior and ventral marginal zones are well developed. Anterior marginal pore canals: 46 straight or straightly curved. Adductor muscle scars round, formed by five scars: in anterior row, three elliptical scars; in posterior row, two subtriangle scars. Remarks: In the lateral outline, this species is similar to Argilloecia sp. of Yamaguchi et al. (2017b) that was reported from upper Paleocene sediments at Site U1407. However it is different from the Paleocene species in having five adductor muscle scars. Suborder CYTHEROCOPINA Baird, 1850 Superfamily CYTHEROIDEA Baird, 1850 Family BYTHOCYTHERIDAE Sars, 1866 Gen. et sp. indet. (Pl. P1, figs. 9, 10) Description: Adult carapace thin and small (384 µm long). In external view, lateral outline subrectangular: anterior margin angular with apex near middle; dorsal and posterior margins slightly sinuous. Maximum height across antero-dorsal corner. Surface ornamented with primary and secondary reticulations and spines. Primary reticulation formed by distinct horizontal muri and polygonal fossae. In secondary reticulation, fossae are round. Conjunctive and disjunctive spines on postero-central area. In internal view, lophodont-type hingement: round tooth of anterior element; smooth median groove. Anterior and postero-ventral marginal zones developed. Remarks: Only two specimens were obtained from Sample 342-U1411B-26X-7W, 40–42 cm. The species is similar to Gen. et sp. 1 of Guernet and Bellier (2000) in the lateral outline and reticulated ornaments. Gen. et sp. 1 was reported from Maastrichtian sediments at ODP Site 1049, northwestern Atlantic. It is different from the Maastrichtian taxon in the direction of muri on the antero-ventral area. The Eocene species shows horizontal muri on the area, whereas the Maastrichtian taxon exhibits convexly curved muri. Family EUCYTHERIDAE Puri, 1954 Genus EUCYTHERE Brady, 1868 Eucythere sp. (Pl. P2, fig. 4) Eucythere cf. circumcostata Whatley and Coles: Majoran and Widmark, 1998, p. 853, fig. 3.4; Majoran et al., 1998, p. 63, pl. 1, fig. 14; Majoran and Dingle, 2002, p. 148, fig. 3.5. Eucythere sp. Bergue and Nicolaidis, 2012, p. 52, fig. 2.22. Description: Adult carapace robust and small (385 µm long). Lateral outline ovate: anterior margin round; posterior margin round with apex at lower one-third of the margin; dorsal margin slightly arched; ventral margin curved with concave up near middle. Postero-dorsal corner angular. Posterior cardinal angle obtuse. Maximum length across middle of anterior margin; maximum height across antero-dorsal corner. Surface with five concentric carinae and punctae: first and second carinae distinct on anterior and posterior areas; third carina distinct on postero-central area. Punctae distributed along concentric carinae. Stratigraphic distribution: Maastrichtian–Chattian. The species occurs from Maastrichtian sediments at DSDP Site 525 (Majoran et al., 1998), southeastern Atlantic, and ODP Site 689 (Majoran and Widmark, 1998), Southern Ocean, and from Danian–Chattian sediments at Site 689 (Majoran and Dingle, 2002). It is reported from the Oligocene at DSDP Site 329, southwestern Atlantic (Bergue and Nicolaidis, 2012). Remarks: As pointed out by Majoran and Dingle (2002), the species is different from the types of E. circumcostata Whatley and Coles, 1987, in lacking punctae on the central area. Family KRITHIDAE Mandelstam cited in Bubikyan, 1958 Genus KRITHE Brady, Crosskey, and Robertson, 1874 Krithe crassicaudata van den Bold, 1946 (Fig. F2B–F2C; Pl. P2, figs. 5–8; Pl. P3, figs. 1–4; Pl. P6, figs. 2–3) Krithe crassicaudata van den Bold, 1946, p. 78, pl. 7, fig. 2a–f; van den Bold, 1960, p. 158, pl. 3, fig. 7a–d; Yamaguchi and Norris, 2012, p. 36, figs. 3.11, 4.1; Yamaguchi et al., 2012, fig. 3. Krithe sp. Cronin and Compton-Goodin, 1987, pl. 6, figs. 4, 7. Description: Adult carapace robust and large in size (635–1089 µm long). Right valve (RV) dorsally overlapped by left valve (LV). In external view, lateral outline ovate: round anterior margin; angular posterior margin; arched dorsal margin; posterior margin concavely curved. Dorsal outline of LV half elliptical: anterior edge tapering; posterior edge angular with indent; outside margin round; dorsal contact to RV obviously curved near middle of valve. Smooth surface. In internal view, lophodont-type hingement: in LV, elongated socket of anterior element: smooth median bar; crenulated socket of posterior element. Broad anterior marginal zone with Y-shaped vestibulum and 13 anterior radial pore canals (ARPCs). ARPC straight or bifurcated. Antero-dorsal radial pore canals (AD): short AD1–AD3 and elongated AD4. Four ovate adductor muscle scars arranged in a row. Frontal muscle scar trilobate. Juvenile carapace robust and small to large in size (290–766 µm long). RV slightly smaller than LV. In external view, lateral outline ovate: round anterior margin; angular posterior margin; arched dorsal margin; posterior margin concavely curved. Dorsal outline of LV half elliptical: anterior edge tapering; posterior edge round; outside margin round; dorsal contact to RV obviously curved near middle of valve. Smooth surface. In internal view, lophodont-type hingement: in LV, elongated socket of anterior element; smooth median bar; half-round socket with crenulation of posterior element. Anterior marginal zone narrow. Eight straight ARPCs. Adductor and frontal muscle scars as same as adult form. Stratigraphic distribution: Maastrichtian–Aquitanian. Coles et al. (1994) indicated that this species ranges from calcareous nannofossil Zones NP18 to NN1 of Martini (1971). Yamaguchi et al. (2017a) reported the species from the Maastrichtian at Site U1407. Remarks: Coles et al. (1994) considered Messinella van den Bold, 1969, as a junior synonym of Krithe crassicaudata. Messinella was originally described from the Neogene Manchioneal Formation in Jamaica. The juvenile form of the species is as large as Messinella species (Table T2; Fig. F3) and similar to Messinella species in the ovate lateral outline with the maximum height across the middle of the valve and straight-shaped ARPC. However, the juvenile form of K. crassicaudata is distinguished from Messinella species by having a trilobate frontal muscle scar and the elongated anterior element without crenulation in the hingement in the internal view, and a curved dorsal contact of LV to RV in the dorsal view. The genus Messinella shows one or two elongate frontal muscle scars and the lophodont-type hingement with crenulated anterior and posterior elements in the internal view and a slightly curved dorsal contact in the dorsal view (van den Bold, 1969). Krithe dolichodeira van den Bold, 1946 (Fig. F2D; Pl. P3, figs. 5, 6; Pl. P6, fig. 4) Krithe dolichodeira van den Bold, 1946, p. 75. pl. 4, fig. 14a, b; Coles et al., 1994, p. 81, pl. 1, figs. 13–18; Ayress et al., 1999, p. 6, fig. 3, G, H; Alvarez Zarikian, 2015, pl. 2, figs. 1–3. Parakrithe hemideclivata Ruan in Ruan and Hao, 1988, p. 272, pl. 45, figs. 12–15. Krithe hemideclivata (Ruan and Hao, 1988), Whatley and Zhao, 1993, figs. 3, 9; Zhao and Whatley, 1997, figs. 5, 4; Irizuki et al., 2007, figs. 5, 3. Stratigraphic distribution: Maastrichtian–present. Coles et al. (1994) illustrated that the species has persisted since calcareous nannofossil Zone NP10 of Martini (1971) (55.81–54.17 Ma). Yamaguchi et al. (2017a) reported the species from the Maastrichtian at Site U1407. Krithe pernoides pernoides (Bornemann, 1855) (Fig. F2E; Pl. P3, figs. 7, 8; Pl. P6, fig. 5) For comprehensive pre-1994 synonymy see Coles et al. (1994). Krithe pernoides pernoides (Bornemann). Coles et al., 1994, p. 104, pl. 5, figs. 7–12, text-fig. 5K–Q. Stratigraphic distribution: Lutetian–present. In the North Atlantic, Coles et al. (1994) states that the species appeared in calcareous nannofossil Zone NP15 of Martini (1971) (46.29–42.87 Ma) and persisted to Zone NN19 (1.93–0.44 Ma). This species is found in the Bay of Biscay (Pascual et al., 2009) and Holocene sediments in the Mediterranean (Fanget et al., 2013; Angue Minto’o et al., 2015). Krithe trinidadensis van den Bold, 1958 (Fig. F2F; Pl. P3, figs. 9, 10; Pl. P6, fig. 6) For comprehensive pre-1999 synonymy see Do Carmo and Sanguinetti (1999). Krithe trinidadensis van den Bold: Ayress et al., 1999, p. 16, figs. 2I, 2J, 7H–L, 8FF, 8GG; Do Carmo and Sanguinetti, 1999, p. 114, pl. 1, fig. 3; Rodriguez-Lazaro and Cronin, 1999, fig. 3.4, pl. 1.7–1.8; Bergue et al., 2006, fig. 7B; Bergue et al., 2013, p. 31, fig. 3M–3P; Alvarez Zarikian, 2009, pl. P7, fig. 5. Stratigraphic distribution: Lutetian–present (Coles et al., 1994; Do Carmo and Sanguinetti, 1999). The species ranges from calcareous nannofossil Zone NP16 of Martini (1971) (42.87–40.40 Ma) to the present. Remarks: The species shows variation in the lateral outline. The illustrated specimen is similar to the specimens of Ayress (1999, fig. 7H) and Bergue et al. (2013, fig. 3N, 3P) in an arched margin from the posterior half of the dorsal margin to the upper half of the posterior margin. Genus PARAKRITHE van den Bold, 1958 Parakrithe vermunti (van den Bold, 1946) (Fig. F2G; Pl. P4, figs. 1, 2; Pl. P6, fig. 7) Cytheridea (Dolocytheridea) vermunti van den Bold, 1946, p. 83, pl. 7, fig. 12a–c. Parakrithe vermunti (van den Bold). van den Bold, 1958, p. 399, pl. 4, fig. 7a–f; Osorio, 1978, p. 68, pl. 2., fig. 4. Description: Adult carapace robust and small (434–487 µm long). In lateral view, subovate lateral outline: anterior margin round; posterior margin round with apex near ventral one-third; dorsal margin arched; ventral margin curved, convex up near anterior one-third. Smooth surface. In internal view, merodont-type hingement: in LV, shallow socket of anterior element; smooth median bar; crenulate socket with five teeth of posterior elements. Marginal zones well developed from anterior to posterior via ventral margin. Vestibulum very narrow. Pore canals: 20 anterior and 13 posterior slightly curved or bifurcated. Four ovate muscle scars arranged vertically in a row. U-shaped frontal muscle scar. Stratigraphic distribution: Priabonian–Messinian. This species was originally described from Oligocene and Miocene sediments in Cuba (van den Bold, 1946). It was reported from lower Oligocene–middle Miocene sediments in Trinidad (van den Bold, 1958). At Site U1411, it is found in upper Eocene and lower Oligocene sediments. In the Pacific, Steineck et al. (1988) assigned the stratigraphic range of the species as planktonic foraminifer Zones N.9–N.17 of Blow (1969), which is correlated with Zones M4 to lower PL1 of Wade et al. (2011). Osorio (1978) reported the species from the Miocene Navidad Formation in Chile. Family LOXOCONCHIDAE Sars, 1928 Genus LOXOCONCHA Sars, 1928; emend. Athersuch and Horne, 1984 Loxoconcha sp. (Pl. P4, figs. 3, 4) Description: Juvenile carapace thin and small (385 µm long). In external view, lateral outline subrhomboidal: anterior margin round; posterior margin round with apex near dorsal one-fourth; dorsal margin slightly arched; ventral margin sinuous with concave up area near middle. Surface reticulated with round fossae. Eye tubercle prominent. In internal view, gongylodont-type hingement: in RV, two teeth and one socket of anterior element; median groove with teeth; two elongated teeth and one socket of posterior element. Remarks: Only one specimen was found. Lacking the anterior and posterior marginal rims and having the gongylodont-type hingement with the crenulated median element indicate the genus Loxoconcha s.s. Athersuch and Horne (1984) redefined Loxoconcha s.s. and considered it to be restricted to the Neogene and Quaternary. Ishii et al. (2005) recognized Loxoconcha punctabella McKenzie, Reyment, and Reyment, 1991 from the upper Oligocene sediments in Australia as Loxoconcha s.s. and pointed out that the genus appeared during the late Paleogene. Loxoconcha sp. indicates that the genus s.s. appeared during the early Oligocene. This species is different from L. punctabella in having a smaller carapace with a slightly curved dorsal margin. Family THAEROCYTHERIDAE Hazel, 1967 Genus POSEIDONAMICUS Benson, 1972 Poseidonamicus pseudorobustus Coles and Whatley, 1989 (Pl. P4, fig. 6) Poseidonamicus pseudorobustus Coles and Whatley, 1989, p. 119, pl. 5, figs. 13–15; Coles, 1996, pl. 2, fig. 10; Hunt, 2007, fig. 8.4; Bergue and Nicolaidis, 2012, p. 54, fig. 3.20–3.21. Stratigraphic distribution: Priabonian–Chattian. At Site U1411, the species is found in sediments from calcareous nannofossil Zone NP19–NP20 (36.97–34.44 Ma). Coles (1996) indicated the range of the species correlated with calcareous nannofossil Zone NP21–NP25 of Martini (1971) (34.44–23.13 Ma) in the North Atlantic. The species was reported from Oligocene sediments at Site 329 in the southwestern Atlantic (Bergue and Nicolaidis, 2012). Family TRACHYLEBERIDIDAE Sylvester-Bradley, 1948 Genus CRONINOCYTHEREIS Yasuhara, Hunt, Okahashi, and Brandão, 2015 Croninocythereis tridentiferae Yasuhara, Hunt, Okahashi, and Brandão, 2015 (Pl. P4, fig. 7) Croninocythereis tridentiferi [sic] Yasuhara, Hunt, Okahashi, and Brandão, 2015, p. 121, figs. 61I–J, 66E–I, 67A–F. Stratigraphic distribution: Middle Eocene–lower Miocene (Yasuhara et al., 2015). The lowest occurrence is from the middle Eocene in DSDP Hole 21A, North Atlantic, whereas the highest occurrence is from the lower Miocene at DSDP Site 529, southeastern Atlantic (Yasuhara et al., 2015). Remarks: Following the agreement in gender to form the species-group names (Article 31.2 of International Code of Zoological Nomenclature), tridentiferi, a masculine genitive, is replaced to tridentiferae, a feminine genitive. Genus DUTOITELLA Dingle, 1981 Dutoitella mimica Dingle, 1981 (Pl. P5, fig. 1) Dutoitella mimica Dingle 1981, p. 88, figs. 37F, 41A–F, 42A–B, 43B–F, 44B; Majoran and Widmark, 1998, p. 854, fig. 3.9–3.11; Majoran and Dingle, 2001, p. 212, pl. 1, fig. 3; Majoran and Dingle, 2002, p. 147, fig. 3.1; Bergue and Nicolaidis, 2012, p. 52, fig. 3.1–3.3; Bergue et al., 2013, p. 29, fig. 2K. Dutoitella cf. mimica Dingle. Majoran et al. 1998, p. 66, pl. 2, fig. 10. Dutoitella aff. mimica Dingle. Majoran et al. 1998, p. 66, pl. 3, fig. 10. Dutoitella sp. 2. Rodriguez-Lazaro and Garcia-Zaraga, 1996, pl. 1, fig. 17. Legitimocythere presequenta (Benson). Guernet and Bellier, 2000, p. 264, pl. 3, figs. 2–3. ? Dutoitella mimica Dingle. Yasuhara et al. 2015, p. 74, figs. 38C–F, 39A–D. Stratigraphic distribution: Maastrichtian–Priabonian. Originally D. mimica is described from Maastrichtian sediments (Dingle, 1981). At Site 689, Southern Ocean and DSDP Site 327, this species is reported from Maastrichtian sediments (Majoran and Widmark, 1998; Majoran et al., 1998). It disappeared near the calcareous nannofossil Zone NP20/NP21 boundary of Martini (1971) (34.44 Ma) (Majoran and Dingle, 2002). In the Basque Basin, the species occurs from the middle Eocene sediments (Rodriguez-Lazaro and Garcia-Zaraga, 1996). Remarks: Dutoitella mimica is similar to Dutoitella praeshusmi Coles and Whatley, 1989, in surface ornaments. D. mimica is distinguished from the latter species by having fewer tubercles along the dorsal margin, three tubercles on the postero-central area, and fewer tubercles on the antero-central area. Yasuhara et al. (2015) regarded D. mimica of Majoran and Widmark (1998) as Dutoitella crassinodosa (Guernet, 1985). However the specimen of Majoran and Widmark (1998) has finer and more tubercles along the dorsal margin than D. crassinodosa with three tubercles along the margin. Genus PENNYELLA Neale 1974; emend. Yasuhara, Hunt, Okahashi, and Brandão, 2013 Pennyella sp. (Pl. P5, figs. 3–6) Description: Adult carapace robust and large in size (707 µm long). In external view, lateral outline subrectangular: anterior margin round; posterior margin round with apex near middle of valve; dorsal margin slightly curved; ventral margin curved, convex up near anterior one-third. Maximum length across apex of posterior margin; maximum height across antero-dorsal corner. Surface ornament with carina and tubercles. Anterior marginal rim formed by carina running from antero-dorsal corner to ventral margin. At least 16 tubercles on anterior marginal rim. Numerous tubercles cover the central area. Four superimposed blunt tubercles near postero-dorsal corner and in central and postero-central areas. Marginal denticles along all margins. In internal view, holamphidont-type hingement: in RV, round tooth and socket of anterior element; smooth median groove; large round tooth with small crenulation of posterior element. Anterior marginal frill and anterior and posterior marginal zones developed. V-shaped frontal muscle scar. Remarks: The species has the following characteristics of the genus Pennyella: the holamphidont-type hingement, tubercled ornament, lateral shape (especially in antero-dorsal area and blunt posterior), ventral swelling, postero-dorsal spine, and width of the inner lamella. This species is distinguished from C. tridentiferae by having surface ornaments with finer and higher-dense spines. This species is similar to Herrigocythere bathypteron (Coles and Whatley, 1989) in spiny surface ornaments but distinguished from H. bathypteron by more tubercles on the anterior marginal rim and finer and more tubercles on the antero-central and central areas. Genus TRACHYLEBERIDEA Bowen, 1953; emend. Haskins, 1963 Trachyleberidea sp. (Pl. P5, figs. 7, 8) Description: Juvenile carapace robust and large (745 µm long). In external view, lateral outline subtrapezoidal: anterior margin round; posterior margin tapering, forming caudal process; dorsal and ventral margins slightly sinuous. Maximum length across caudal process; maximum height across antero-dorsal corner. Marginal denticles along anterior margin and lower part of posterior margin. Anterior marginal rim running to postero-ventral area. Perforate spine at terminal of ventral rim. Spine present at antero-dorsal corner. Surface ornaments with reticulation of trefoil celation and blunt muri. Reticulation on ventral area is flattened. In internal view, lophodont-type hingement: in LV, elongate socket of anterior element; straight smooth median bar; elongated half-round socket of posterior element. Anterior marginal zone narrow. Anterior marginal frill very well developed. Remarks: Only one specimen was obtained from the samples. The specimen shares the reticulation of trefoil celation and blunt muri and the distinct ventral rim with Trachyleberidea mammidentata (van den Bold, 1946). The juvenile form possibly is of T. mammidentata. |