doi:10.2204/iodp.pr.308.2005
Gulf of Mexico Hydrogeology
Overpressure and fluid flow processes in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico: slope stability, seeps, and shallow-water flow
Download report in PDF format (Adobe Reader).
Table of Contents
- TITLE PAGE
- PUBLISHER'S NOTES
- PARTICIPANTS
- ABSTRACT
- INTRODUCTION
- SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES
- OPERATIONAL STRATEGY
- SITE RESULTS
- DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
- OVERVIEW OF EXPEDITION ACHIEVEMENTS AND PRELIMINARY SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT
- OPERATIONS
- REFERENCES
- TABLES
- FIGURES
- Figure F1. Overpressure.
- Figure F2. Flow-focusing model.
- Figure F3. Flow-focusing example.
- Figure F4. Gulf of Mexico bathymetric image.
- Figure F5. Brazos-Trinity Basin #4 bathymetric chart.
- Figure F6. Dip seismic Section 3020.
- Figure F7. Strike seismic Line 3045.
- Figure F8. Ursa region bathymetric image.
- Figure F9. Seisimic cross-section AA' basemap.
- Figure F10. Logging data, M.C. 810 Ursa geotechnical well #1.
- Figure F11. Seismic and interpreted cross-section AA'.
- Figure F12. T2P penetrometer and data example.
- Figure F13. Combination diagram, Site U1319.
- Figure F14. Combination diagram, Site U1320.
- Figure F15. Combination diagram, Site U1321.
- Figure F16. Combination diagram, Site U1322.
- Figure F17. Combination diagram, Site U1323.
- Figure F18. Combination diagram, Site U1324.
- Figure F19. Mud trucks.
- Figure F20. Pressure versus depth with weighted mud.
- Figure F21. MWD results.
- Figure F22. T2P and DVTPP.
- Figure F23. Characteristic deployments of DVTPP and T2P.
- Figure F24. Probe deployment success data.
- Figure F25. Probe deployment illustration.
- Figure F26. Dip-oriented seismic line across Brazos-Trinity Basin #4.
- Figure F27. Strike-oriented seismic line across Site U1320.
- Figure F28. Preliminary age model.
- Figure F29. Brazos-Trinity Basin #4 stratigraphic cross-section.
- Figure F30. Core photographs.
- Figure F31. Correlation between Sites U1322, U1323, and U1324.
- Figure F32. Age contraints summary.
- Figure F33. Seismic data and line-drawing interpretation.
- Figure F34. Ursa Basin mass transport deposits.
- Figure F35. Porosity versus depth, Sites U1319, U1320, and U1321.
- Figure F36. Void ratio, Sites U1319 and U1320.
- Figure F37. Porosity versus depth, Sites U1322, U1323, and U1324.
- Figure F38. Void ratio and pore pressures, Sites U1322 and U1324.
- Figure F39. Porosity versus depth, Sites U1319, U1320, and U1324.
- Figure F40. Pore water geochemical profiles, Sites U1319 and U1320.
- Figure F41. Pore water geochemical profiles, Sites U1322 and U1324.
- Figure F42. Porosity versus depth, Sites U1322 and U1324.
- Figure F43. Porosity-based presure predictions.
- Figure F44. Penetrometer tools pressure versus depth.
- Figure F45. Temperature data.
- Figure F46. Temperature gradients and conceptual model of flow.
Publication date: 8 September 2005
Contact
IODP-USIO Publication Services if you need assistance.
IODP Expeditions |
Scientific Publications |
News |
Education |
Policies |
Search
|