Proc. IODP, 314/315/316, Structural and seismic stratigraphic framework of the NanTroSEIZE Stage 1 transect

IODP Proceedings Volume contents Search


Expedition reports Research results Supplementary material Drilling maps Expedition bibliography
Chapter contents Abstract Introduction Regional setting of the NanTroSEIZE transect 3-D seismic data Acquisition Processing Resolution of the 3-D seismic data Data presentation and interpretation Regional perspective Detailed views around NanTroSEIZE drill sites Discussion Frontal thrust zone Frontal prism Megasplay Normal faulting seaward of megasplay thrust Kumano forearc basin Conclusions Acknowledgments References Figures F1. Regional bathymetry. F2. Track plot. F3. Acquisition geometry. F4. Bathymetry and preliminary geological interpretation. F5. Inline 2675, PSTM vs. PSDM. F6. Composite seismic line. F7. Regional bathymetry, Sites C0006 and C0007. F8. Regional seismic line, Sites C0006 and C0007. F9. Seismic inline, Sites C0006 and C0007. F10. Regional bathymetry, Sites C0001, C0003, C0004, and C0008. F11. Regional seismic inline, Site C0001. F12. Regional seismic inline, Sites C0004 and C0008. F13. Regional seismic cross-lines, splay fault area drill sites. F14. Seismic inline, Site C0001. F15. Seismic cross-line, Site C0001. F16. Seismic inline, Site C0004 and Holes C0008A and C0008C. F17. Seismic cross-line, crossing Site C0004. F18. Seismic cross-line, Hole C0008A. F19. Seismic cross-line, Hole C0008C. F20. Regional bathymetry, Site C0002. F21. Seismic inline, Site C0002. F22. Seismic cross-line, Site C0002. Appendix PDF file			Previous \| Next doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.314315316.102.2009 Acknowledgments Funding for this project was provided in part by the Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, and Technology (MEXT) in Japan and the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) via grants OCE-0451790 (UH), OCE-0452340 (UT), and OCE-0800653 (UW). The authors would like to thank the officers, crew, and technical staff of the PGS vessel Nordic Explorer for collecting excellent quality data under difficult circumstances and the processing group at CGG in Kuala Lumpur for producing an excellent PSTM product. A review by Juli Morgan clarified many parts of the final draft. We thank Paradigm for providing the GeoDepth software used for the 3-D PSDM. SOEST Contribution 7591; UTIG Contribution 2051. Top of page \| Previous \| Next

Acknowledgments