IODP Proceedings Volume contents Search | |||
Expedition reports Research results Supplementary material Drilling maps Expedition bibliography | |||
doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.336.102.2012 MicrobiologyThe primary microbiology objectives for Expedition 336 were to determine the microbial community composition and activity of the deep biosphere harbored in the buried basaltic oceanic crust at Sites 395A, U1382 (~50 m west of Hole 395A), and U1383 (prospectus Site NP-2) and near the sediment/basement interface in Holes U1383D and U1383E (near the new deep Hole U1383C subseafloor borehole observatory [CORK]), U1382B (near Hole 395A), and U1384A (prospectus site NP-1) at the North Pond site on the western Mid-Atlantic Ridge flank. Strategies to reach these objectives included deployment of novel microbial colonization devices within CORK observatories (see Edwards et al., 2012; Orcutt et al., 2010, 2011), opportunistic sampling of biofilms on an old CORK recovered from Site 395, and collection of fresh crustal rocks by drilling in oceanic crust along the presumed flow path of formation fluids. These studies complement and expand upon similar work conducted on the eastern flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge (Cowen et al., 2003; Engelen et al., 2008; Fisher et al., 2005, 2011; Nakagawa et al., 2006; Orcutt et al., 2010, 2011; Steinsbu et al., 2010), although the Juan de Fuca sites represent a reduced and warm hydrothermal setting as compared to the cool hydrothermal conditions within North Pond oceanic crust. These studies also build upon previous decades of work studying fluid flow in basement at North Pond and a recent site survey cruise with the R/V Merian (Ziebis et al., 2012). A secondary microbiology objective of this expedition was to collect sediment from multiple sites around North Pond, including prospectus Sites NP-1 (Hole U1384A) and NP-2 (Holes U1382D and U1382E) and Site 395 (Hole U1382B), to examine the phylogenetic and functional connection between sediment microbial communities and those harbored within oceanic crust and the overlying seawater and to examine how these relationships may vary vertically (i.e., with distance from the sediment/basement interface) and horizontally (i.e., along the presumed flow path of fluids within oceanic crust). Of interest was the evaluation of basement fluid flow on basal sediment biogeochemistry and microbial ecology, as has been evaluated elsewhere (Engelen et al., 2008; Lever et al., 2010). This section focuses on the shipboard methods used for rock and sediment sample collection and handling for microbiological analyses; CORK-related microbiology experiments are described in Edwards et al., 2012. Briefly, samples of oceanic crust collected for microbiology were subsampled for environmental DNA and RNA extraction and analysis, cell counts, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) studies, contamination tests, evaluation with the new deep ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence scanner for biofilm biomass (Bhartia et al., 2010), and several enrichment and culturing experiments. Sediment samples were also collected for DNA and RNA extraction and analysis, cell counts, FISH studies, contamination tests, lipid analysis, and several enrichment and culturing experiments to be conducted on shore. Core handling and samplingTo examine potential contamination of hard rock and sediment core samples, slurries of yellow-green fluorescent microspheres (Fluoresbrite Carboxylate Microspheres; Polysciences, Inc., 15700) were sealed in plastic bags and placed inside the core catcher prior to deployment of the core barrel according to standard protocol (Smith et al., 2000). Microspheres were used in every RCB core during hard rock coring and also in every APC and XCB core during coring in sediments and across the sediment/basement interface. Perfluorocarbon tracer contamination checks (Lever et al., 2006) were not conducted during this expedition. Hard rock coresHard rock samples for microbiology originated from RCB coring in Holes U1382A and U1383C and from ACP and XCB coring in Holes U1383D, U1383E, U1382B, and U1384A. Priority was given to large (>10 cm in length) intact pieces or samples with interesting lithology. Nominally one sample was collected per section during RCB coring. Immediately following delivery of core on deck and cutting of the core liner into 1.5 m sections, rocks were exposed for subsampling in the core splitting room by shaking the recovered rocks into another split core liner (which, because of frequent splitting blade breakage, was much faster than trying to split the recovered core liner). Rocks for microbiological sampling were identified immediately, photographed in place, and then collected using combusted aluminum foil for transport to the microbiology laboratory. During ACP and XCB coring, some rocks were handled in the above manner, when appropriate; otherwise, rock and sediment matrix material was transferred via sterile spatula on the catwalk into a sterile Whirl-Pak bag for subsequent subsampling. All sample handlers wore gloves to reduce contamination. In the laboratory, whole-round rock pieces were transferred to sterile Whirl-Pak bags containing 10 mL of sterile filtered seawater for gentle rinsing and removal of any microspheres and other contaminates. The rinse was collected into a 15 mL conical vial and stored at 4°C until processing. The rinsing process was repeated three times. Next, the rock was transferred to a flame-sterilized rock processing box (Expedition 327 Scientists, 2011) and broken into smaller pieces using flame-sterilized chisels and forceps. Subsampling was done as rapidly as possible (5–15 min) to minimize oxygen exposure and cell degradation. Rock fragments were then split into aliquots for the following analyses, depending on available sample volume:
Leftover rock material was washed in deionized water, dried, and returned to shore-based laboratories for use as substrate in future colonization experiments. Sediment coresSediments for microbiological analysis were collected from four holes as whole-round core or syringe samples. APC and XCB cores were cut on the catwalk using sterilized tools (autoclaved spatulas and bleach-cleaned end caps). Everyone assisting in the core cutting and sediment sampling wore gloves to minimize contamination. Each core was inspected before being cut to determine the integrity of the sediment and the potential for disturbance during drilling or recovery. A predetermined sampling plan was followed for each core and section to maximize sampling efficiency and accuracy. Samples were collected from almost every section recovered provided the section was of sufficient quality. A general sampling plan is described below; the full sampling plan is included as Figures F8, F9, F10, and F11.
Storage and shipment conditionsAll samples for shore-based DNA/RNA extraction and analysis were stored and shipped frozen (–80°C), whereas samples for shore-based FISH and enrichment studies were stored and shipped cold (–20°–4°C). Analytical methodsCell counts, FISH, and spectroscopy of hard rock materialsSample fixation for FISH is described above. Washed samples will be used for shore-based FISH analyses, whereas unwashed samples will be used for cell counting with either SYBR Green I or acridine orange fluorescent dye using previously described methods (Morono et al., 2009). On the basis of results from DNA extraction and analysis, microbial groups of interest will be investigated using group-specific FISH primers according to published protocols (Biddle et al., 2006). Dried samples for micro- and nano-imaging (with X-ray, electron, and UV-visible spectroscopies) were transferred for shore-based analysis with flame-sterilized pliers to sterile centrifuge tubes without any treatment. Manually polished sections (using gloves and absolute ethanol) or freshly broken fragments will be characterized for mineralogical and organic matter content using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman microspectroscopy (Beyssac et al., 2003; van Zuilen et al., 2007; Marshall et al., 2010) and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry and X-ray microscopy (Rommevaux-Jestin and Menéz, 2010; Ménez et al., 2007). Ultrathin sections will be prepared using a focused ion beam as described by Benzerara et al. (2005) for observations using scanning X-ray microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (Benzerara et al., 2006). Nucleic acid extraction and analysisDNA will be extracted in shore-based laboratories using a variety of methods, depending on sample type and analytical laboratory, to maximize cross-comparison of methods. Genes of interest, including the 16S rRNA gene as well as functional genes, will be amplified using multiple amplification strategies. In one shore-based laboratory, DNA will be extracted from hard rock samples using the MO BIO DNA extraction kit for soil (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc.), following the manufacturer’s protocol with minor modification. An archaeal 16S rRNA gene amplicon library will be prepared, and the resulting library will be sequenced using the 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencing platform (454 Life Sciences, Roche). The taxonomic affiliation of each read will be resolved as described elsewhere (Lanzén et al., 2011). In addition, archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA genes will be quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) following a previously described protocol (Roalkvam et al., 2011). Specific archaeal groups such as Marine Benthic Group B and Marine Group I may be quantified by qPCR with group-specific primers, depending on results from the amplicon library. In another shore-based laboratory, DNA will be extracted from hard rock samples using a “homemade” DNA extraction protocol utilizing phenol-chloroform extraction following published protocols (Lever et al., 2010; Orcutt et al., 2011). In addition, 16S rRNA genes will be amplified with published primer sets using Ion Torrent semiconductor sequencing (Rothburg et al., 2011) coupled with Sanger-style sequencing. In another shore-based laboratory, DNA and RNA will be extracted from hard rock samples using the MO BIO PowerSoil DNA extraction kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc.) following the manufacturer’s protocol with minor modifications, as described in Gérard et al. (2009). Genes of interest, including the 16S rRNA gene and some functional genes, will be amplified using PCR with published protocols. Total RNA will be extracted from sediment and crushed basalt in another shore-based laboratory using a method previously described in Mills et al. (2008) with modifications noted in Mills et al. (2012). Extracts will be treated with deoxyribonuclease (DNase) to remove residual DNA prior to reverse-transcription PCR. Initial amplifications will target the 16S rRNA gene transcripts using published primers. Amplicons will be sequenced using the 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencing platform (454 Life Sciences, Roche). The metabolically active community structure will be determined by sequence annotation. Functional gene transcripts will be quantified on the basis of results of community structure analysis to determine community function. To evaluate the preenrichment microbial community in sediments prior to cultivation, a preliminary analysis by PCR amplification will be conducted in a shore-based laboratory to examine the existence of methanogens, sulfate reducers, and methanotrophs. DNA will be extracted from each sediment sample using the PowerMax soil DNA isolation kit (MO BIO laboratories, Inc.) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The gene encoding methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) of methanogens will be amplified using a PCR method, as described by Nunoura et al. (2008). The gene encoding dissimilatory sulfite reductase (dsrA) of sulfate reducers will be amplified using a PCR method, as described previously (Kondo et al., 2004). The gene encoding particulate methane monooxygenase (pmoA) will be amplified using a PCR method, as described previously by Tavormina et al. (2008). Deep UV fluorescence scanningTo evaluate the presence of cells and organics on the surfaces of hard rock materials using deep UV fluorescence (Bhartia et al., 2008, 2010), rock fragments (1–2 cm3) were scanned with the new Deep Exploration Biosphere Investigative portable tool (DEBI-pt) similar to the Deep Exploration Biosphere Investigative tool (DEBI-t) downhole logging tool described in “Downhole logging.” The DEBI-pt combines a targeted ultraviolet chemical sensor (TUCS) (Photon Systems, Inc.) with an X-Y scanning stage. A 224.3 nm HeAg hollow-cathode laser induces fluorescence of organics and microbes. Detection uses six discrete, laser-gated PMT-based bands at 280, 300, 320, 340, 360, and 380 nm. The laser focuses on a 200 µm spot translated over the sample at a rate that satisfies Nyquist sampling. Using the motor encoders, the maps are displayed in millimeters and provide spatial coordinates from a registered set of points. Samples for DEBI-pt analysis were carefully collected during rock subsampling to preserve the interior and exterior orientation of the material. Pieces were photo-documented before being wrapped in baked foil and stored at 4°C to enable detailed correlation of DEBI-pt scans with sample orientation. Samples collected from coring operations were placed on a stage below the TUCS. Care was taken to minimize exposure of the samples to potential contaminants. A charged-coupled device camera was used for targeting and focus. Once the sample was in focus, the x and y sample dimensions and the desired degree of overlap were input in the control software. When the scanning run was complete, the data were transferred to interpolation software that created a multidimensional array that was then viewed with a custom analysis package, which represented the data as a fluorescence map indicating the location and intensity of fluorescence for each of the bands. The scanned samples were then stored for shore-based thin sectioning for petrology to correlate fluorescence regions with the mineralogy of each sample. DEBI-pt experiments were also conducted with smears of the microsphere solutions, pipe dopes, and drilling fluids used during coring to generate background spectra profiles for these materials that could be used for comparison with natural samples. Culturing and enrichmentSeveral types of metabolic groups will be targeted by enrichment and cultivation using various techniques, as outlined below. Target 1
Target 2
Target 3
Target 4
Target 5
Target 6
Target 7
Target 8
Onshore sample requestsSediment samples were collected for multiple onshore sample requests. Requests included both molecular and culture-based analysis. These requests were fulfilled when they complemented without overlapping the work being conducted by the onboard science party. These plans included nitrogen-based culturing, colony-forming units, lipid and fatty acid analysis, and phosphorus-cycling measurements. Sediment samples were collected approximately once per core for each of the four requests and preserved at either 4° or –80°C, as instructed (Figs. F8, F9, F10, F11). Additional samples were collected using a syringe from the top of selected sections (Fig. F12). |