IODP Proceedings Volume contents Search | |||
Expedition reports Research results Supplementary material Drilling maps Expedition bibliography | |||
doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.308.101.2006 Operational strategyThe overall strategy for Expedition 308 was to complete continuous coring, wireline logging, in situ measurements, and LWD/MWD operations at each primary site. As time allowed, we would also visit alternate locations. To minimize the time that expensive LWD tools and personnel were kept on board the ship, we first cored and performed downhole measurements in Brazos-Trinity Basin IV and then performed LWD measurements first in Brazos-Trinity Basin IV and then in Ursa Basin. Thereafter, the LWD tools were offloaded and final coring and downhole measurements were performed in Ursa Basin (Table T2). We used LWD because we expected to encounter thick unconsolidated sands in Brazos-Trinity Basin IV and because we might encounter unconsolidated sands in Ursa Basin. Unconsolidated sands can create unstable boreholes where it is not possible to deploy wireline tools. LWD would ensure that a good logging suite would be obtained. We also planned to use MWD. In MWD, logging data are communicated in real time from near the drill bit to the ship so that the borehole conditions can be continuously monitored. In Ursa Basin, we expected to encounter overpressured mud and it was possible we would encounter overpressured and unconsolidated sands. If we encountered overpressured and unconsolidated sands, there was a risk that “shallow-water flow” would occur. Shallow-water flow results when overpressured, unconsolidated sands flow into a borehole that has a lower pressure than the formation pressure. With MWD, we would be able to monitor both the downhole annular pressure and the formation lithology. When shallow-water flow occurs, a pressure peak is recorded as sand flows into the borehole. Through continuous monitoring we would be able to decide whether it was necessary to increase the mud weight to offset the flow into the borehole or terminate the drilling and kill the well. Finally, to minimize shallow-water flow, we planned to use heavy mud during drilling and coring of portions of Sites U1324 and U1323. We also planned to deploy heavy mud during long-term in situ measurements with penetration probes (Davis-Villinger Temperature-Pressure Probe [DVTPP] or temperature/dual pressure [T2P] probe). It was planned to use two downhole tools to measure pressure and temperature: the T2P, which was designed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Pennsylvania State University, and Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) U.S. Implementing Organization Science Services, Texas A&M University (TAMU) and the DVTPP. The T2P is designed to measure pore pressure more rapidly than the DVTPP. It has a narrow tip with a temperature and pressure sensor; a second pressure measurement is collected slightly up-probe from the sensors at the tip (Fig. F12). The design allows for rapid measurement of pressure in low-permeability sediments. In addition to temperature measurements made with the T2P and DVTPP, temperature measurements were made during coring with the advanced piston corer (APC) using the APC temperature (APCT) tool. Sampling of multiple 10–20 cm long whole-round cores was planned to assist interpretation of the T2P and DVTPP data, directly measure formation pressures, and infer the in situ stress state through laboratory analysis. |