-
- Chapter contents
- Abstract
- Introduction
-
Methods and materials
- Results
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- References
-
Figures
-
Tables
-
Appendix figures
- AF1. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001E-4H-2, vertical.
- AF2. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001E-4H-2, horizontal.
- AF3. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001F-3H-2, vertical.
- AF4. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001F-3H-2, horizontal.
- AF5. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001F-10H-11, vertical.
- AF6. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001F-10H-11, horizontal.
- AF7. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001F-15H-2, vertical.
- AF8. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001F-15H-2, horizontal.
- AF9. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001H-7R-3, vertical.
- AF10. Hydraulic gradient, Sample 315-C0001H-7R-3, horizontal.
-
Appendix tables
- AT1. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001E-4H-2, vertical.
- AT2. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001E-4H-2, horizontal.
- AT3. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001F-3H-2, vertical.
- AT4. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001F-3H-2, horizontal.
- AT5. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001F-10H-11, vertical.
- AT6. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001F-10H-11, horizontal.
- AT7. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001F-15H-2, vertical.
- AT8. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001F-15H-2, horizontal.
- AT9. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001H-7R-3, vertical.
- AT10. Permeability results, Sample 315-C0001H-7R-3, horizontal.
-
PDF file
|
|
|
Previous |
Next
doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.314315316.204.2012
Conclusions
The highest value of vertical hydraulic conductivity calculated for these samples is 7.30 × 10–7 cm/s with corresponding intrinsic permeability of 7.25 × 10–16 m2. The lowest value of vertical hydraulic conductivity is 1.06 × 10–8 cm/s (1.05 × 10–17 m2). The highest value of horizontal hydraulic conductivity is 5.01 × 10–7 cm/s (4.97 × 10–16 m2), and the lowest value of horizontal hydraulic conductivity is 1.35 × 10–8 cm/s (1.34 × 10–17 m2). The mean anisotropy ratio for permeability is 1.15, and the range for anisotropy ratio is 0.44–1.56. Imaging of the microfabric shows that arrangements of particles are mostly random. A majority of values for the standard deviation of grain orientation from vertical sections are greater than those from horizontal sections. The indexes of microfabric orientation do not show a systematic trend with increasing burial depth.
Top of page |
Previous |
Next
|