Proc. IODP, 317, Site U1354

IODP Proceedings Volume contents Search

Expedition reports Research results Supplementary material Drilling maps Expedition bibliography
Chapter contents Background and objectives Hole U1354A Hole U1354B Hole U1354C Operations Transit to Site U1354 Site U1354 overview Hole U1354A Hole U1354B Hole U1354C Lithostratigraphy Description of lithologic units Correlation with wireline logs Downhole trends in sediment composition and mineralogy Description of lithologic surfaces and associated sediment facies Discussion and interpretation Biostratigraphy Calcareous nannofossils Planktonic foraminifers Benthic foraminifers Paleowater depths Diatoms Macrofossils Paleomagnetism Section-half measurements Magnetostratigraphy Physical properties Gamma ray attenuation bulk density Magnetic susceptibility Natural gamma radiation P-wave velocities Spectrophotometry and colorimetry Moisture and density Sediment strength Geochemistry and microbiology Organic geochemistry Inorganic geochemistry Microbiology Heat flow Geothermal gradient Thermal conductivity Downhole logging Operations Data quality Porosity and density estimation from the resistivity log Logging stratigraphy Log-seismic correlation Stratigraphic correlation References Figures F1. Seismic dip profile. F2. Map of drilled and proposed sites. F3. Lithologic summary. F4. Core recovery and lithology, Hole U1354B. F5. Core recovery and lithology, Hole U1354C. F6. Lithostratigraphic correlation. F7. Homogeneous mud lithology, Unit I. F8. Additional Unit I lithologies. F9. Coarser Unit I lithologies. F10. Mineral and textural percentage estimations. F11. Correlation of Holocene–Pleistocene succession. F12. Sediment correlation based on lithostratigraphy and paleomagnetic ages. F13. Planktonic and benthic foraminifer correlation. F14. Planktonic foraminiferal abundance. F15. Paleodepth interpretation. F16. NRM paleomagnetic record, Hole U1354A. F17. NRM paleomagnetic record, Hole U1354B. F18. NRM paleomagnetic record, Hole U1354C. F19. Raw and filtered physical property data. F20. Bulk density comparison. F21. MS and NGR. F22. P-wave velocity. F23. Lab* color parameters. F24. Porosity comparison. F25. Bulk density, grain density, porosity, and void ratios. F26. Sediment shear strength. F27. CH₄, C₂H₆, CO₂, and C₁/C₂ in HS gas. F28. Carbonate carbon, TC, TN, TOC_DIFF, and TOC_DIFF/TN. F29. Salinity, chloride, Na, pH. F30. Ca, Mg, Mg/Ca, Sr, Sr/Ca, and alkalinity. F31. Sulfate and phosphate. F32. K, Ba, Li, Si. F33. B, Fe, Mn. F34. Alkalinity, SO₄, Ca, Mg, CH₄, Mg/Ca, Ba, PO₄. F35. Stoichiometry of the sulfate-reduction zone. F36. Temperature data. F37. Thermal conductivity. F38. "Sonic combo" log data vs. physical properties. F39. Summary of "sonic combo" logs. F40. Spectral natural gamma ray. F41. Comparison of downhole and uphole logging passes. F42. Comparison of synthetic seismogram and EW00-01 Line 66. F43. Depth-adjusted MS and NGR records. Tables T1. Coring summary. T2. Lithostratigraphic summary. T3. Lithologic surfaces and interpretation. T4. Microfossil bioevents. T5. Calcareous nannofossils. T6. Planktonic foraminiferal summary, Hole U1354A. T7. Planktonic foraminiferal summary, Hole U1354B. T8. Planktonic foraminiferal summary, Hole U1354C. T9. Planktonic foraminifers, Hole U1354A. T10. Planktonic foraminifers, Hole U1354B. T11. Planktonic foraminifers, Hole U1354C. T12. Benthic foraminifers. T13. Diatoms. T14. Invertebrate macrofossils. T15. Headspace gas composition. T16. Core void gas composition. T17. Carbon and nitrogen analyses. T18. Salinity, pH, alkalinity, and ion chromatograph data. T19. Spectrophotometry and ICP-AES data. T20. Temperature data. T21. Thermal conductivity data. T22. Cumulative depth adjustments. PDF file			Previous \| Next doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.317.106.2011 References Archie, G.E., 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. J. Pet. Technol., 5:1–8. Browne, G.H., and Naish, T.R., 2003. Facies development and sequence architecture of a late Quaternary fluvial-marine transition, Canterbury Plains and shelf, New Zealand: implications for forced regressive deposits. Sediment. Geol., 158(1–2):57–86. doi:10.1016/S0037-0738(02)00258-0 Collett, T.S., 1998. Well log evaluation of gas hydrate saturations. Trans. SPWLA Annu. Logging Symp., 39:1998-MM. Fairbanks, R.G., 1989. A 17,000-year glacio-eustatic sea level record: influence of glacial melting rates on the Younger Dryas event and deep-ocean circulation. Nature (London, U. K.), 342(6250):637–642. doi:10.1038/342637a0 Fofonoff, N.P., 1985. Physical properties of seawater: a new salinity scale and equation of state for seawater. J. Geophys. Res., [Oceans], 90(C2):3332–3342. doi:10.1029/JC090iC02p03332 Hayward, B.W., 2001. Global deep-sea extinctions during the Pleistocene ice ages. Geology, 29(7):599–602. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0599:GDSEDT>2.0.CO;2 Hornibrook, N. de B., Brazier, R.C., and Strong, C.P., 1989. Manual of New Zealand Permian to Pleistocene foraminiferal biostratigraphy. Paleontol. Bull., 56. Jarrard, R.D., Dadey, K.A., and Busch, W.H., 1989. Velocity and density of sediments of Eirik Ridge, Labrador Sea: control by porosity and mineralogy. In Srivastava, S.P., Arthur, M.A., Clement, B., et al., Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, 105: College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program), 811–835. doi:10.2973/odp.proc.sr.105.146.1989 Kameo, K., and Bralower, T.J., 2000. Neogene calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of Sites 998, 999, and 1000, Caribbean Sea. In Leckie, R.M., Sigurdsson, H., Acton, G.D., and Draper, G. (Eds.), Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, 165: College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program), 3–17. doi:10.2973/odp.proc.sr.165.012.2000 Lu, H., and Fulthorpe, C.S., 2004. Controls on sequence stratigraphy of a middle Miocene–Holocene, current-swept, passive margin: offshore Canterbury Basin, New Zealand. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 116(11):1345–1366. doi:10.1130/B2525401.1 Schlumberger, 1989. Log Interpretation Principles/Applications: Houston (Schlumberger Educ. Serv.), SMP–7017. Shell BP Todd, 1984. Drilling completion report, Clipper-1. Offshore Canterbury, South Island, New Zealand. PPL38202. Min. Econ. Dev. N. Z. Pet. Rep., PR1036. https://data.crownminerals.govt.nz/MEDGUEST/system/mainframe.asp Shipboard Scientific Party, 1999. Site 1119: drift accretion on Canterbury Slope. In Carter, R.M., McCave, I.N., Richter, C., Carter, L., et al., Proc. ODP, Init. Repts., 181: College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program), 1–112. doi:10.2973/odp.proc.ir.181.103.2000 Top of page \| Previous \| Next

References