IODP Proceedings Volume contents Search | |||
Expedition reports Research results Supplementary material Drilling maps Expedition bibliography | |||
doi:10.2204/iodp.proc.330.101.2012 Introduction and backgroundUnderstanding the nature of mantle plumes is a critical goal of modern Earth sciences. The extent to which hotspots conform to the Wilson-Morgan fixed plume hypothesis (Wilson, 1963; Morgan, 1971) fundamentally constrains the assumptions used in models of mantle convection. To date, studies of the Hawaiian-Emperor Seamount Trail have dominated our thinking about hotspot volcanism, and as a consequence models for the construction and evolution of intraplate volcanoes, plate motion, and hotspot motion are strongly biased toward the Hawaiian hotspot. Without comparable data from any other important Pacific hotspot trail, many key questions remain unanswered. The Louisville Seamount Trail (Fig. F1) is the product of one of only three primary hotspots in the Pacific (together with Hawaii and Easter; Courtillot et al., 2003) and has great potential for providing these answers. New results from Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) drilling of the Louisville Seamount Trail during Expedition 330, together with existing data and future drilling of other hotspot trails in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, will provide the best available opportunity to assess the importance of the motion between hotspots (or groups of hotspots) and true polar wander. These data, in turn, will provide some of the most valuable information on Earth’s convection regime and a crucial calibration of current mantle flow models and global plate circuit reconstructions. Hotspots and the (deep) mantle plumes that are presumed to be their underlying cause (e.g., Morgan, 1971) are essential features in contemporary geodynamic models of the Earth’s mantle. One of the attributes frequently assigned to mantle plumes is fixity in the mantle. This fixity contrasts sharply with the motion rates of the overlying plates, which can be as high as 100 mm/y. However, plume theory does not demand fixity (e.g., Steinberger and O’Connell, 1998; Koppers et al., 2001), and paleomagnetic evidence collected during Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Legs 145 and 197 at Detroit, Suiko, Nintoku, and Koko Seamounts in the Emperor Seamount Trail indicates that the Hawaiian hotspot has moved at a speed similar to that of plate motion for tens of millions of years (Kono, 1980; Petronotis et al., 1994; Tarduno and Cottrell, 1997; Tarduno et al., 2003, 2009; Duncan et al., 2006). Three-dimensional mantle convection computations confirm this notion by generating mantle plumes with long, narrow thermal conduits that are anchored (deep) in the mantle (Davies and Davies, 2009) but that may migrate at rates of 10 mm/y and higher, primarily depending on the assumed viscosity contrast between the lower and upper mantle and the configuration of the subducting plates (Lowman et al., 2004). These observations raise critical questions. Is the rapid motion documented for the Hawaiian hotspot an isolated event or does it happen to other hotspots as well? If so, do these hotspots move in a sufficiently coherent fashion that subsets can be used as a moving reference frame for reconstructing past plate motion? To address these questions we must distinguish between the following geodynamic end-member models:
The first model predicts that the motion of the Louisville hotspot should be equivalent to the 15° of southern motion documented for the Hawaiian hotspot between 80 and 50 Ma. The second model predicts an essentially eastward motion for the Louisville hotspot over the last 120 m.y., with a maximum shift in paleolatitude not exceeding 6° between 80 Ma and the present day, depending on various assumptions used in the mantle flow models (Fig. F2). Both models can be tested by drilling the Louisville Seamount Trail and accurately determining the paleolatitudes (from detailed paleomagnetic measurements on individual lava flows) and 40Ar/39Ar age dates for a small number of seamounts between 80 and 50 Ma. For this purpose Expedition 330 provided a direct comparative test by mimicking Leg 197 drilling in the Emperor Seamounts as closely as possible (Tarduno et al., 2003; Duncan and Keller, 2004; Duncan et al., 2006, 2007), targeting guyots equivalent in age to Detroit (76–81 Ma), Suiko (61 Ma), Nintoku (56 Ma), and Koko (49 Ma) Seamounts (Fig. F1). Although determining paleolatitudes in the context of a high-resolution 40Ar/39Ar age framework was the main objective of Expedition 330, this project also afforded the opportunity to constrain the eruptive cycle and geochemical evolution of typical Louisville volcanoes. The Hawaiian and Louisville hotspots have been labeled as primary hotspots in the Pacific on the basis of obvious linear age progressions, long-lived and continuous volcanism, large buoyancy fluxes, and high (in the case of Hawaii) 3He/4He ratios (Courtillot et al., 2003; Koppers et al., 2003). Such hotspots are theorized to represent the locales at which plumes are rising from deep in the mantle, perhaps from near the core/mantle boundary (Clouard and Bonneville, 2001; Davaille et al., 2002; Courtillot et al., 2003). Unlike earlier studies that postulated many (or even all) hotspots represent plumes originating from the core/mantle boundary, Courtillot et al. (2003) have argued that most hotspots arise from relatively shallow levels and that only a small number of primary plumes ascend from the core/mantle boundary. Nonetheless, among the primary hotspots of the Pacific Ocean, some marked differences in geochemistry and volcanic evolution are apparent. For example, the near-exclusive recovery of alkalic basalt in the Louisville Seamount Trail (Hawkins et al., 1987; Vanderkluysen et al., 2007; Beier et al., 2011) raises the question of whether Louisville volcanoes have an alkalic shield-building phase instead of the tholeiitic shield-building phase that is a trademark of Hawaiian volcanoes. One possibility is that the shield stage of a Louisville volcano reflects systematically lesser amounts of partial melting than in the Hawaiian case, caused by deeper melting under a uniformly thicker lithosphere. In addition, isotopic and trace element data from Louisville suggest a long-lived and remarkably homogeneous mantle source (Cheng et al., 1987; Hawkins et al., 1987; Vanderkluysen et al., 2007; Beier et al., 2011). If these volcanoes have entirely alkalic shield-building phases that are isotopically homogeneous over 80 m.y. of volcanic activity, this has major implications for how we think volcanism works for the Louisville hotspot and intraplate volcanism in general. Mantle geodynamics and hotspot motionRecently, it has been proposed that plume conduits may become strongly tilted at times because of large-scale mantle flow (e.g., Steinberger and O’Connell, 1998), which possibly may explain the fast southward hotspot motion observed for the Hawaiian hotspot (~40 mm/y) between 80 and 50 Ma (Tarduno et al., 2003). Such strong tilts may happen if the conduit is affected by a lower mantle return flow between cold downwellings associated with subduction and large-scale upwellings in the neighborhood of “superplumes.” Alternatively, the capturing, bending, and releasing of the Hawaiian mantle plume by an ancient ridge system may also explain these observations (Tarduno et al., 2009). For the Hawaiian hotspot, all of these ingredients are present—a zone of past subduction to the north, a large-scale upwelling related to the Superswell to the south (Tarduno et al., 2003), and the waning of the Kula-Pacific ridge system to the north of the hotspot—allowing a possibly captured Hawaiian plume to quickly return to its original straight position in a dominantly southward flow (Tarduno et al., 2009). However, because the Louisville hotspot lies south of the Superswell, the closest subduction system has always been located to its west, and no spreading center has been located north and in close proximity for most of its geological history, this pattern is not compatible with a similar rapid southward motion for the Louisville hotspot. Modeling by Steinberger et al. (2004) shows the expected results of this configuration, whereby the Hawaiian hotspot indeed moves 15° south from 80 to 50 Ma, but the Louisville hotspot moves primarily in an easterly direction between 130 and 60 Ma, and only ~2.5° south since 60 Ma (Fig. F2A). In these models a large-scale mantle flow field is first calculated from mantle density heterogeneities (as derived from seismic S-wave speed anomalies) by applying a radial mantle rheology structure (with a lower mantle assumed to be more viscous) and by using tectonic plate motions as boundary conditions (Steinberger and O’Connell, 2000; Steinberger and Calderwood, 2006). Within the modeled mantle flow field, a vertical plume conduit is inserted that gets advected over time, resulting in the sometimes strong tilting of mantle plumes and the drifting of hotspots (Steinberger and O’Connell, 2000; Steinberger and Antretter, 2006). Advection dominates the motion of a plume at depths where it rises relatively slowly in comparison to the overall mantle flow field, typically in the lower mantle. As a result, hotspot motion seems in many cases (including Louisville) to be similar to the predicted horizontal flow in the mid-mantle, at which depth the transition occurs from motion dominated by advection in the lower mantle to a more vertical motion dominated by the buoyant rising of the mantle plumes in the upper mantle (Steinberger, 2000). These characteristics remain the same regardless of whether mantle plumes originate at the core/mantle or 670 km boundary layers. In spite of the large uncertainties in the data and the assumptions on which they are built, these mantle flow models provide an excellent basis for placing the geological data derived from Louisville and other seamount trails into a more complex geodynamic context. Mantle flow models using the modeling approach of Steinberger et al. (2004) thus show a largely eastward motion for the Louisville hotspot, which is very different from the ~15° southward motion for Hawaii during the same time interval. This longitudinal motion for the Louisville hotspot is followed by only a minor latitudinal shift over the last 60 m.y. (Fig. F2B, Model 5 in Fig. F2C). These models, however, show large variations in their predictions depending on the assumptions made, such as plume initiation age, root depth, viscosity structure, plume buoyancy, plume rising speed, plate motion history, and mantle viscosity. Antretter et al. (2004) and Steinberger and Antretter (2006) have considered the possible effects of these assumptions in more detail for the Louisville hotspot and predict paleolatitude shifts between almost none and ~8° to the south, as integrated over the last 80 Ma. However, the majority of their model runs (see Fig. F2C for six representative examples) show a latitudinal motion for Louisville that is significantly less than that observed for Hawaii. Also, for models that show a faster Louisville hotspot motion, the increased motion is always more eastward, in a direction away from the subduction zone and toward the spreading ridge. Paleolatitude shifts of Pacific hotspots also can be estimated by transferring plate motion from Indo-Atlantic hotspots to the Pacific plate using global plate circuits, assuming fixity of Indo-Atlantic hotspots. For example, Doubrovine and Tarduno (2008a, 2008b) showed that the Late Cretaceous to Paleogene apparent polar wander path transferred from the paleomagnetic data of the Atlantic-bordering continents to the Pacific plate is consistent with the ~15° paleolatitude shift observed in the Hawaiian-Emperor Seamount Trail. Shifts in paleolatitude of the Louisville hotspot can be predicted by the same approach (Fig. F3), although a large uncertainty still remains in the global plate circuit, which may go through East and West Antarctica (Cande et al., 1995) or, alternatively, through the Lord Howe Rise (Steinberger et al., 2004). Also critical is the current location of the Louisville hotspot, which still is a matter of debate because of its faint expression at the younger end of this seamount trail (Lonsdale, 1988; Raymond et al., 2000; Wessel and Kroenke, 1997; Koppers et al., 2011). All plate reconstructions (using different combinations of plate circuits and present-day hotspot locations) yield predictions that become significantly different from the position of the Louisville Seamount Trail prior to 45 Ma (Fig. F3). As with mantle flow models, a large longitudinal shift is apparent at 78 Ma when comparing the oldest seamounts in the trail to the reconstructed position for Chron C33, which all plot markedly west of the Louisville Seamount Trail. It is interesting to note that the predicted potential southward shift in these plate tectonic reconstructions seems less pronounced for the oldest seamounts (3.8° and 4.0°, depending on the plate circuit used), is largest for the ~53 Ma seamounts (8.9° and 9.8°, which actually indicates a possible 4°–5° northward motion of the plume between 80 and 50 Ma), and is nonexistent for seamounts younger than ~45 Ma. The above geodynamic and plate tectonic models thus provide different predictions for the latitudinal (and longitudinal) history of the Louisville hotspot. These models were ground truthed during IODP Expedition 330, which should allow us to distinguish between the following possibilities:
By comparing paleolatitudes from the paleomagnetic measurements on cored basalt flows and high-precision 40Ar/39Ar ages for the Hawaiian and Louisville Seamount Trails, drilling results from Expedition 330 will offer strong constraints for one of these possibilities. Finding a large latitudinal shift between 80 and 50 Ma clearly would indicate that current assumptions in the mantle flow models are wrong. Finding no appreciable shift, on the other hand, would indicate significant interhotspot motion between the Hawaiian and Louisville hotspots and a stronger local control on the mantle flow regime. Paleolatitude measurements of the Louisville Seamount Trail can also be used for comparisons of interocean motion between hotspots in the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic Oceans. In previous studies, large discrepancies of up to 20° in motion have been reported between hotspot groups in the Pacific and Atlantic/Indian Oceans (Cande et al., 1995; DiVenere and Kent, 1999; Raymond et al., 2000). These observations have led to models of large-scale motion of the mantle underneath each ocean or to explanations involving true polar wander, which is defined as a coherent shift of the entire mantle relative to the spin axis (Goldreich and Toomre, 1969; Gordon, 1987; Besse and Courtillot, 1991, 2002; Torsvik et al., 2002). Drilling of the Louisville Seamount Trail helped to expand the necessary global paleolatitude and 40Ar/39Ar age databases needed to evaluate the above scenarios. In fact, Expedition 330 will allow us to determine paleolatitude data for a time interval similar to that sampled in the Emperor Seamount Trail during Leg 197 and earlier expeditions (Kono, 1980; Tarduno et al., 2003), and future ocean drilling expeditions to the Chagos-Laccadive and Ninetyeast Ridges in the Indian Ocean and Walvis Ridge in the Atlantic Ocean may refine the existing paleolatitude record for other volcanic chains. These expeditions may provide a state-of-the-art paleolatitude database covering five major hotspot trails in three oceans, all between 80 and 50 Ma in age. At that point it will be clear whether the observed paleolatitude shifts in hotspots are best explained by coherent motion of all hotspots, by coherent motion of hotspot groups within each ocean domain (but with relative motion between these groups), by incoherent motion of all individual hotspots, or by true polar wander. Age relations along the Louisville Seamount TrailUsing high-resolution 40Ar/39Ar age data, Koppers et al. (2004) found that the age progression for the Louisville Seamount Trail is overall nonlinear (blue squares in Fig. F4A). Site survey 40Ar/39Ar age data from the SO167 and AMAT02RR expeditions underline the nonlinear character of the Louisville age progression (Fig. F4A), yet they also show a very systematic age-progressive trend from ~20 to 80 Ma (Koppers et al., 2011). Deviations from earlier reported ages and a hypothesized 64 mm/y linear age progression (Watts et al., 1988) become noticeable around 35 Ma and are most significant toward the old end of the trail, where some guyots are now dated ~15 m.y. older than previously reported (Koppers et al., 2004). For now, the age progression for the Louisville Seamount Trail seems best approximated by the purple line in Fig. F4A, which simply envelops the oldest ages and follows the model of Koppers et al. (2004). Interestingly, new age information from the SO167 dredges reveals a more complex age distribution in the older portion of the Louisville Seamount Trail, with some seamounts showing ages considerably younger than the age-progressive volcanism, which is the first evidence of late-stage or rejuvenated volcanic activity for this trail (O’Connor et al., submitted). Understanding the evolution of a typical Louisville seamount through state-of-the-art 40Ar/39Ar age dating (Fig. F4B) therefore will be crucial in evaluating models predicting relative motion between hotspots. For example, Wessel and Kroenke (2009) examined the temporal variations in the geographical separation between the Louisville and Hawaiian hotspots, as measured by any change in their great-circle distance over time. By considering both the geometry and the 40Ar/39Ar ages of the seamounts constituting these two primary seamount trails, they concluded that the Louisville hotspot may have moved several degrees to the south relative to Hawaii before ~55 Ma because congruent seamounts in both trails formed at a larger great-circle distance from each other during that time. However, they also showed that the Louisville and Hawaiian hotspots kept a very constant separation after that episode of interhotspot motion. Between 55 Ma and the present day, both hotspot systems seemingly have been moving in tandem, or more likely have been stationary, without any significant interhotspot motion for a prolonged period of time. The age, and hence lithospheric thickness, of the seafloor at the time of seamount formation in the Louisville Seamount Trail is poorly constrained for seamounts west of the Wishbone Scarp. Early studies suggested that Louisville volcanoes generally erupted onto seafloor that was ~40–50 Ma (Lonsdale, 1988; Watts et al., 1988; Lyons et al., 2000). These estimates are best constrained east of the Wishbone Scarp, where magnetic anomalies provide crustal ages. Watts et al. (1988) noted a smaller effective elastic thickness, and thus a smaller age difference, for seamounts west of the Wishbone Scarp. A recent seismic refraction study of the oceanic lithosphere beneath the 27.6°S Guyot (~1.1° south of Site U1372; Fig. F5) delineates flexure of the Mohorovicic seismic discontinuity (MOHO), which has been interpreted as reflecting volcano growth on ~10 m.y. old lithosphere (Contreras-Reyes et al., 2010). This smaller age difference appears generally consistent with the age of Osbourn Guyot (76–79 Ma) and its distance from the Osbourn Trough paleospreading center. The age at which spreading at the Osbourn Trough ceased is not well constrained because it occurred within Chron C34 (a ~37 m.y. long interval of normal polarity), but recent estimates suggest that spreading may have continued until between ~86 and ~93 Ma (Downey et al., 2007; Worthington et al., 2006). Thus, the oldest seamounts in the Louisville Seamount Trail may have formed on relatively young, thin lithosphere. Seafloor ages beneath younger Louisville volcanoes that lie west of the Wishbone Scarp are also highly uncertain, although the crustal age (and lithospheric thickness) may increase significantly toward the Wishbone Scarp. Mortimer et al. (2006) report a U/Pb zircon age of 115 Ma from a dacite sample recovered along the western extension of the Wishbone Scarp (i.e., southwest of the bend in the Louisville Seamount Trail at ~169°W. Together with the estimated age of ~86 to ~93 Ma for Osbourn Trough spreading, it appears that crustal ages may increase from the northwestern end of the Louisville chain toward the Wishbone Scarp (Müller et al., 2008). The difference between ocean crust and seamount ages may be only ~10 m.y. at Osbourn Guyot (78 Ma), the oldest seamount in the Louisville Seamount Trail, and this age difference may systematically increase to as much as 65 m.y. near the Wishbone Scarp. Variations in lithospheric thickness along the older portion of the Louisville chain (west of the Wishbone Scarp) consequently may be important for the geochemical evolution of the volcanoes, as discussed below. Geochemical evolution of the Louisville hotspotThe construction and geochemical history of an intraplate seamount often is envisioned to resemble that of a typical Hawaiian hotspot volcano (Clague and Dalrymple, 1988). There is, however, little empirical evidence for a similar evolutionary sequence in the Louisville Seamount Trail. Essentially, all igneous rocks dredged from the Louisville Seamount Trail are alkalic basalt, basanites, or tephrites containing normative nepheline (Fig. F6A) (Hawkins et al., 1987; Vanderkluysen et al., 2007; Beier et al., 2011). In addition, isotopic and trace element data from this seamount trail suggest a long-lived and remarkably homogeneous mantle source equivalent to the proposed “common” components FOZO (Focal Zone) or C (Fig. F6B) (Cheng et al., 1987; Hawkins et al., 1987; Vanderkluysen et al., 2007; Beier et al., 2011). The minor variations in major and trace elements appear to be controlled mostly by variable extents of melting and fractional crystallization but with little influence from mantle source heterogeneities (Vanderkluysen et al., 2007; Beier et al., 2011). This raises important questions that will be addressed by geochemical studies of the samples cored during Expedition 330. For example, do Louisville volcanoes evolve through geochemically distinct shield, postshield, and rejuvenated stages, similar to Hawaiian volcanoes? If so, is the dominant shield stage characterized by the eruption of tholeiites or rather by alkalic lava? Tholeiites generally represent greater amounts of partial melting than does more alkalic lava. One possibility is that the typical shield stage of a Louisville volcano reflects a systematically lesser amount of partial melting than in the Hawaiian case. It is also possible that dredging may have sampled only later stage lavas that cover the shield-stage flows. Interestingly, the least alkalic lava obtained by dredging is from Osbourn Guyot near the Kermadec Trench, where extensive faulting may have exposed older shield-building lava (Hawkins et al., 1987). The basement penetration achieved during Expedition 330 may have allowed direct sampling of the waning part of the shield-building stage, providing key constraints on the geochemical and magmatic evolution of the Louisville volcanoes in this primary hotspot system. Hawaiian shield-stage lava flows possess a wide range of isotopic and incompatible element compositions, which is even greater when data for postshield and posterosional lava are included. In contrast, incompatible element ratios (e.g., Zr/Y and Nb/Y) and radiogenic isotope ratios for the Louisville Seamount Trail are surprisingly homogeneous (Fig. F6B). Lithospheric thickness is a key control on partial melting—and thus on the composition of the produced magma—because it determines the minimum depth of the top of the melting column and limits the extent of decompressional melting that occurs in the upwelling mantle (e.g., McKenzie and Bickle, 1988). Other things being equal, greater amounts of partial melting occur under thin lithosphere, and, in a mantle containing isotopically and chemically distinct lithologies, different mantle components are likely to begin to melt at different depths (Sun and Hanson, 1976; Ellam, 1992; Phipps Morgan and Morgan, 1999; Hoernle et al., 2000; Niu et al., 2002; Ito and Mahoney, 2005; Devey et al., 2003). For the Emperor Seamounts, much of the observed isotopic and chemical variation may be related to changing proximity to a spreading center and related changes in lithospheric thickness (Keller et al., 2004; Regelous et al., 2003). In contrast, for most of the Louisville Seamount Trail, the limited geochemical variation could reflect relatively uniform melting conditions over 80 m.y. or a remarkably homogeneous plume source. Uniform melting conditions could be a result of limited variation in lithospheric thickness; however, as noted above, along-chain variations in lithospheric thickness at the time of volcanism are still being debated. Louisville as a primary hotspotCourtillot et al. (2003) have argued that most hotspots arise from relatively shallow levels and that no more than three primary plumes (Hawaii, Easter, and Louisville) ascend from the core/mantle boundary in the Pacific Basin. These authors suggest several criteria by which primary plumes may be assessed, the chief geochemical criterion being high 3He/4He ratios in hotspot lavas. Although agreement is not universal (e.g., Meibom et al., 2003), high 3He/4He ratios are considered by the great majority of scientists to be a sign of a deep-mantle origin (e.g., Allègre et al., 1983; O’Nions, 1987; Farley and Neroda, 1998). Hawaiian basalt, for example, has 3He/4He values as high as 35 RA (where RA is the atmospheric 3He/4He ratio), and even higher values have been reported for samples from Iceland. In comparison, mid-ocean-ridge basalt (MORB) typically has values of only 7–10 RA (e.g., Graham, 2002). No He isotope data have been published for the Louisville Seamount Trail. Another geochemical indicator of a deep-mantle origin is high 186Os/188Os, which is interpreted by some workers to signify Os derived from the outer core. Only a few studies of Os isotopes in oceanic hotspot lava have yet been performed, but anomalously high 186Os/188Os and 187Os/188Os ratios have been discovered in at least some of the primary hotspots, such as Hawaii (e.g., Brandon et al., 1999). Although interpretation of the elevated Os isotope ratios is debated (e.g., Smith, 2003), combined studies of Os and He isotopes have the highest potential to reveal any deep-mantle signature in oceanic lava. Drilling during Expedition 330 recovered a high number of basalt flows with relatively unaltered olivine crystals and oxide minerals that will allow us to assess the applicability of these geochemical criteria to the Louisville volcanic chain. If these tests indicate that Louisville does not have a deep (lower) mantle origin, this outcome will place limits on mantle flow models by forcing a shallower root for its mantle plume. Although geodynamic modeling likely cannot resolve the depth of origin between primary and secondary hotspots, geochemical results possibly can on the basis of characteristically high 3He/4He and 186Os/188Os deep-mantle plume ratios. Relation between the Louisville hotspot and the Ontong Java PlateauThe Ontong Java Plateau has been proposed to be a large igneous province that is the product of the Louisville hotspot’s initial plume-head phase (e.g., Richards and Griffiths, 1989; Mahoney and Spencer, 1991; Tarduno et al., 1991). However, existing isotopic data for Louisville dredge samples (Cheng et al., 1987; Vanderkluysen et al., 2007; Beier et al., 2011) offer no strong support for such a connection (Mahoney et al., 1993; Tejada et al., 1996). Ontong Java and Louisville samples have similar age-corrected Nd and Sr isotope values, but Louisville lava has significantly higher Pb isotope ratios than Ontong Java basalt (Fig. F6B), and the difference is more than can be accounted for by ingrowth of radiogenic Pb in the mantle source between 120 and 80 Ma (Vanderkluysen et al., 2007). Expedition 330 drill sites will provide a much more rigorous test of any geochemical connection between the Ontong Java Plateau and the Louisville Seamount Trail to address this possible genetic relation. Mantle temperatures of the Louisville hotspotComparable to other primary hotspots, potential temperatures of the Louisville mantle plume sources are expected to be 100°–300°C higher than the 1350° ± 50°C temperature of an upper-mantle MORB source (Putirka, 2008; Courtier et al., 2007). Fresh olivine-phyric basalt was encountered at all Expedition 330 drill sites. The alkalic (shield) lavas of the Louisville Seamounts drilled are excellent candidates for determining the Mg-Fe compositions of the olivine phenocrysts and melt-inclusions therein. In turn, these compositions will yield information about source temperatures by relating the Mg/Fe ratio of the olivines directly to that of the liquid from which they crystallized (e.g., Putirka et al., 2007). The challenge here is to make these determinations on the most Mg-rich olivines that also come closest to equilibration with the parental magma compositions, a task that may be more complicated for the Louisville Seamounts because all samples studied so far are relatively evolved. Melt inclusions and volatiles in volcanic glassesMelt inclusions can provide key insights into the “true” compositional variability of the mantle source from which the Louisville magmas were generated. Because melt inclusions are small (tens to a few hundreds of micrometers in diameter) volumes of melt trapped in phenocrysts, they can remain isolated from differentiation and alteration affecting the external bulk magma, thereby preserving more primitive liquid compositions compared to those determined from groundmass glass or bulk-rock analyses (Sobolev, 1996; Kent, 2008). If trapped in an early crystallizing phase, such as olivine, they may even reveal primary magma compositions and can provide insights into the mantle source of these magmas (Saal et al., 1998; Hauri, 2002). These inclusions often span a range of compositions wider than those exhibited by groundmass glass or bulk rock when they are being trapped at different stages in the evolution of the magma (Frezzotti, 2001; Danyushevsky et al., 2002). Melt inclusion studies will therefore complement bulk-rock analyses of Louisville basaltic rocks because potential heterogeneities are more likely to be recorded by melt inclusions. In addition, if melt inclusions are trapped before or during volatile degassing, suitable crystalline host phases (without cleavage or any other imperfections) may act as pressure vessels, which can isolate the trapped melt from pressure changes affecting the bulk magma. Melt inclusion volatiles therefore may preserve the initial magma volatile concentration and speciation and the degassing path undertaken by the magma (Wallace, 2005). Hydrothermal and seawater alterationSeamounts may rival mid-ocean-ridge flanks in terms of the total mass of seawater fluxed through their basement. They therefore are likely to play a critical role in regulating chemical crust-ocean exchange fluxes. In this regard, ocean-ridge-flank systems have been studied by several authors (Alt and Teagle, 1999, 2003; Bach et al., 2003), but the alteration and veining history of seamounts has not yet been studied in any detail. During Expedition 330, five seamounts having crustal ages between 50 and 80 Ma and only thin sedimentary covers were drilled, providing a unique opportunity for investigating exchange fluxes between these seamounts and the ocean. Whole-rock geochemical studies as well as Sr, O, H, and C isotopic analyses of carbonate veins and alteration minerals will provide the basis for reconstructing seawater-rock interaction through the lifetime of hydrologic activity on these seamounts. Because of the thin sedimentary cover on the Louisville Seamounts it is likely that seawater access to these volcanic basements has been long term, and thus they are excellent targets for assessing the magnitude of carbonate vein formation in aging oceanic crust and its role as a global CO2 sink. Geomicrobiology and fossil microbial tracesSince the 1990s, microbiologists on ODP and IODP expeditions have documented the presence of microbial life in deeply buried sediments and the basaltic basement (Fisk et al., 1998; Parkes et al., 1994). Active microbial life has been detected as far below the seafloor as 1626 m (Roussel et al., 2008), and the introduction of molecular biology into marine ecology has led to great advances in our understanding of microbial life below the seafloor (Cowen et al., 2003; Inagaki et al., 2006; Mason et al., 2010). To date, however, microbiology studies have concentrated on sediments, with the notable exception of expeditions to the Juan de Fuca Ridge (Cowen et al., 2003) and the Atlantis Massif (Mason et al., 2010), both of which sampled oceanic crust younger than 3.5 Ma. Stable isotope evidence (Rouxel et al., 2008) and microbial fossils (Fisk et al., 1998) indicate that there is a subsurface biosphere in older basement rocks as well. Microbial fossil traces found there are believed to result from the boring activity of microorganisms that mostly colonized the volcanic glass to which the bacterial cells and filaments are connected (Thorseth et al., 1995; Fisk et al., 1998; Furnes et al., 2001). A different type of boring activity is recorded in carbonates precipitated in the veins, vesicles, and void spaces of volcanic rocks (Peckmann et al., 2008; Eickmann et al., 2009; Ivarsson et al., 2008). These carbonate cements have enclosed filaments that very closely resemble budding and branching microbial structures. Expedition 330 provides an excellent opportunity to study both living and extant microbial residents within the old, 50–80 Ma subseafloor volcanic rocks sampled at the Louisville Seamounts. Differences in microbial population between the overlying (pelagic) sediments and volcaniclastic layers and the basaltic basement are of keen interest, as is variation between lava flows with depth in the seamount structures and between seamounts of different age. |